Religious Protesters

protester.jpgI don’t know the ins & outs of hate speech legislation (and, no, I’m not an advocate for general curtailment of speech), but consider this snippet from a letter regarding religious protestors at Mardi Gras to today’s paper:

This year they really managed to go overboard with their banner proclaiming “Catholicism Is A False Religion” and by verbally attacking a young girl on a neighbor’s balcony, telling her she and her parents were going to hell. She was having a wonderful time throwing beads to other children.

The writer’s point was to ban bullhorns, but it got me to thinking about the potential of considering these guys as threatening. Can telling people that they’re going to hell be considered hateful speech? I realize that such signs are not on par with the threat posed by burning crosses, nooses, etc, but just the same, does it constitute any sort of physical threat? They’re not saying that they are going to bring you to hell, but most racists don’t say they are going to cause you harm either; just that, you’d better watch your back.

As ridiculous as most people I know think these guys are (and, in a way, they add to the spectacle; I got a kick out of it a few years ago when they were on a particularly anti-gay bent near Good Friends. After the barkeeps turned hoses on them, the protesters quickly and proudly got rain jackets and hoods; their look of pride said, “Onward Christian Soldier,” as though they had just been martyred or something), do they have a right to condemn people to hell? I know that most of us who are out on Fat Tuesday aren’t doing anyone any harm, so these guys aren’t going to be too persuasive, but where is the line between witnessing and harming?

FWIW, as a psychologist and a person with some pretty noncommittal religious views, they would indeed be more effective if they had signs that said something like, “If you’re feeling a little guilty about what you’ve done today, talk to me.” Might increase their total converts to about 2.

Advertisements

2 Responses to Religious Protesters

  1. Maitri says:

    SO SO SO badly want to, but we just can’t illegalize bad taste!

    As a big supporter of the First Amendment, which I’m sure you are, where I draw the line is when one of these people pulls a knife or gun on someone. Then, it’s assault and punishable by law. Until then, hate speech and hate crimes are just legislative wastes of time. In other words, I will support the KKK in saying whatever they want until they physically hurt me or someone close to me, after which they’re toast. Toast, I say! This is why I also support the Second Amendment (but realize that Tom and Andy weren’t talking about AKs).

  2. loki says:

    Actually had one lay his hands on me this year, and I do nt mean faith healing. He pushed me back and told me to get out of their space. I told him my uncle is a local judge and he could go enjoy a jailhall honeymoon with a large man named Bubba if he touched me again. Then I walked off, wasn’t going to blow my Mardi Gras with an actual confrontation.

    They are becoming bolder in the Post K world, I think they have gained boldness both from the perceived lawlessness and from their missionary zeal.

    Thanks for your comments about Copeland on HumidCity.com. Don’t know how I missed your blog, but I like your perspective and am linking you now.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: